What the statute requires
- Governing statute
- Nevada Revised Statutes chapter 82, Nonprofit Corporations, Nev. Rev. Stat. sections 82.006 to 82.546
- Minimum directors
- 1. Section 82.196 requires every corporation to be managed by a board of directors or trustees and to have at least one director or trustee. Every director must be at least eighteen years old. The articles or bylaws may fix a set number of directors or a variable range with a minimum and maximum, and may say how the number is changed. Unless the articles say otherwise, directors need not be members, and the articles or bylaws may provide that some or all directors are chosen by named persons or by public officials. Nevada sets no higher floor for charitable corporations or for corporations for public benefit, so a single director satisfies chapter 82.
- Term length
- Chapter 82 sets no default term length and no maximum. Section 82.286(1) provides that if a corporation has members entitled to vote for directors, the directors are chosen at the annual meeting of the members or delegates on a date, time, and in the manner provided in the bylaws, by a plurality of the votes cast, and that if they are not elected then they may be elected at a special meeting called for that purpose. Section 82.286(2) lets the articles or bylaws classify directors as to their respective terms of office, elect them by class or by geographic district, and elect them annually by ballot instead of at a meeting. Section 82.301 provides that if directors are not elected on the designated day the corporation is not dissolved and every director continues to hold office and discharge a director's duties until a successor is elected.
- Term limits
- Not specified by statute.
- Quorum
- Section 82.271(1) makes a majority of the board a quorum at a duly assembled meeting unless the articles or bylaws provide for a different proportion, and the act of a majority of the directors present at a meeting where a quorum is present is the act of the board. Nevada names no floor, so the articles or bylaws may set the proportion higher or lower. Section 82.271(2) allows action without a meeting by written consent signed by a majority of the board, or by the larger proportion if a larger proportion would be needed for that action at a meeting, unless the articles or bylaws restrict it. Section 82.271(3) treats participation by electronic communication, videoconference, or teleconference as presence in person.
- Annual meeting
- Chapter 82 never commands a corporation to hold an annual meeting. Section 82.286(1) assumes one for a corporation whose members elect directors, saying the directors must be chosen at the annual meeting of members or delegates on a date fixed by the bylaws. Section 82.306 backs that up: if a corporation fails to elect directors within eighteen months after the last required election, members holding ten percent of the voting power, or fifty members, whichever is fewer, may petition the district court to order an election. A Nevada nonprofit with no voting members has no statutory meeting duty at all, and chapter 82 sets no minimum number of board meetings.
- Conflict of interest
- Section 82.226(1) provides that a contract or transaction between the corporation and one or more of its directors or officers, or an entity in which they are directors, officers, or financially interested, is not void or voidable solely for that reason, or because the interested director was present or the interested votes were counted, if any one of four circumstances exists. The four are that the interest is disclosed or known to the board or committee and noted in the minutes and the board approves it in good faith by a sufficient vote without counting the interested votes; or the interest is disclosed or known to the members and they approve it in good faith by a sufficient vote, in which case the interested directors' member votes do count; or the director or officer did not know of the interest when the matter came before the board; or the transaction is fair to the corporation when authorized. Section 82.226(2) lets interested directors count toward quorum. Section 82.226(3) lets the board fix director compensation unless the articles or bylaws say otherwise. Nevada requires no written conflict of interest policy.
- Removing a director
- Section 82.296(1) lets members representing at least a majority of the voting power entitled to vote for the director in question remove that director, with two qualifications: where directors are elected by cumulative voting, removal requires the votes that would have prevented the director's election, and the articles or bylaws may require a larger percentage. Section 82.296(2) provides that if there are no members entitled to vote for directors, a director may be removed by a majority vote of the directors entitled to vote for that director. Section 82.296(3) lets a director appointed by a public official or other person named in the articles or bylaws be removed with or without cause by written notice from the appointer to the chair or president, and the appointer may fill the vacancy. Otherwise, section 82.296(4) lets a majority of the remaining directors fill vacancies even if they are fewer than a quorum. Section 82.311 separately lets any director, or one third of the members, ask the district court to appoint an impartial provisional director when the board is deadlocked and the corporation is threatened with irreparable injury.
- Recurring state filing
- Nevada calls it a list, not an annual report. Section 82.193(3) subjects nonprofit corporations to sections 78.150 to 78.185 with nonprofit specific amounts: fifty dollars to file a list, a fifty dollar default penalty, and one hundred dollars to reinstate. Section 78.150(1) requires an initial list at the time the articles are filed, and section 78.150(2) requires an annual list on or before the last day of the month in which the anniversary of incorporation falls. Section 78.150(1) requires the names and titles of the president, secretary, and treasurer or their equivalents and of all the directors, an address for each one, and the signature of an officer certifying the list is true, complete, and accurate. Section 78.150(3) requires a declaration under penalty of perjury, including a statement that no officer or director was listed with the fraudulent intent of concealing who actually exercises that authority.
What's particular to Nevada
Nevada's statutory floor is one director and that director has to be at least eighteen. Section 82.196 is unusual on both counts: most nonprofit corporation acts require three directors, and few set a minimum age in the corporate statute itself. The same section also lets the articles or bylaws hand the power to choose some or all directors to named persons or to public officials, which is how many Nevada nonprofits build in an appointing sponsor.
The recurring filing is an annual list of officers and directors, not a narrative report, and it is priced separately for nonprofits. Section 82.193(3) sets the list fee at fifty dollars where a for profit Nevada corporation would pay at least one hundred fifty under section 78.150(4). The list is due by the last day of the anniversary month of incorporation, and a first list is due when the articles are filed. Because section 78.150(1)(c) requires every director by name and address, the Nevada board roster becomes a public record that is refreshed every year.
Nevada nonprofits are outside the state business license entirely. Section 76.020(2)(e) excludes a business organized under chapter 82 from the definition of business, and section 76.100(7)(a)(1)(I) repeats the carve out. Section 76.105(6) means a chapter 82 corporation does not even have to file a claim for exemption, unlike an unincorporated charity that has to claim one and renew it each year.
Nevada protects directors more aggressively than most states. Section 82.221(3) says a director must not be found to have failed to exercise powers in good faith and with a view to the interests of the corporation unless it is proved by clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher burden than the ordinary civil standard. Section 82.221(4) then bars any action against a director for failing to exercise due care in managing the corporation unless the act or omission involved intentional misconduct, fraud, or a knowing violation of law, though section 82.221(5) lets the articles of incorporation impose greater liability if the founders want it.
This is a summary, not legal advice.
We cite the statute so you can read it yourself, and we last checked these on September 3, 2026. Statutes change, courts interpret them, and your own bylaws may impose stricter rules than the state does. Before you rely on any of this for a decision that matters, have a lawyer licensed in Nevada review it.
About our sources for Nevada: Nevada's legislature website blocks automated access, so these sections were read from archived copies of the official pages captured in July and August 2026. The chapter 82 page carries its own revision stamp showing it reflects the 2025 session. Nevada's Secretary of State could not be reached, so the filing details rest on the statute alone with no administrative cross-check.
Knowing the rule is the easy part.
Staying compliant means knowing whose term ends in March, whether you'll still have quorum after it does, and who hasn't signed this year's conflict of interest form. Board Manager tracks all three and tells you before they become a problem.
Start free, no card neededSources
- Nevada Revised Statutes chapter 82, Nonprofit Corporations, Nev. Rev. Stat. sections 82.006 to 82.546 ↗
- Nev. Rev. Stat. chapter 82, Nonprofit Corporations, full chapter text ↗
- Nev. Rev. Stat. chapter 78, Private Corporations, including section 78.150 annual list ↗
- Nev. Rev. Stat. chapter 76, State Business Licenses ↗
- Nevada Legislature, Nevada Revised Statutes index ↗